Rep. Karl Oliver, the Republican from Winona who incited a social media uproar after calling for the lynching of Louisiana officials who removed Confederate monuments from New Orleans, issued an apology late Monday morning.
“I, first and foremost, wish to extend this apology for any embarrassment I have caused to both my colleagues and fellow Mississippians,” Oliver wrote in an email.
“In an effort to express my passion for preserving all historical monuments, I acknowledge the word ‘lynched’ was wrong,” Oliver said.
“I am very sorry. It is in no way, ever, an appropriate term,” he continued. “I deeply regret that I chose this word, and I do not condone the actions I referenced, nor do I believe them in my heart. I freely admit my choice of words was horribly wrong, and I humbly ask your forgiveness.”
When reached by phone Monday, Oliver, who was at the State Capitol, declined an in-person interview. He said he did not have anything further to say beyond his statement.
“This is not what I intended,” Oliver said. He removed the Facebook post from his page shortly after issuing the apology.
The post, which was written Saturday evening, condemned the removal of the four Confederate monuments from the city of New Orleans.
“If the, and I use this term extremely loosely, ‘leadership’ of Louisiana wishes to, in a Nazi-ish fashion, burn books or destroy historical monuments of OUR HISTORY, they should be LYNCHED!” Oliver wrote.
Rep. Karl Oliver: Those removing Confederate monuments ‘should be lynched’Gov. Phil Bryant and Speaker of the House Philip Gunn, along with other Republican officials, denounced Oliver’s statement. Gunn called on Oliver to apologize. “Rep. Oliver’s language is unacceptable and has no place in civil discourse,” Bryant said in an email Monday morning. New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu, a Democrat who pushed for removal of the statues, emailed this response to Mississippi Today about Oliver’s post: “Now that everyone can see Mississippi State Rep. Oliver’s position on the matter clearly, his message proves our fight to tackle the issue of race head on is both right and necessary.” Gunn, R-Clinton, also condemned Oliver’s words in an emailed statement, writing “They do not reflect the views of the Republican party, the leadership of the House of Representatives or the House as a whole. Using the word “lynched” is inappropriate and offensive.” At a Stennis Capitol Press Forum, Gunn told a room full of press, lobbyists and other government stakeholders that he revoked Oliver’s position as vice-chairman of the House Forestry Committee. “(Oliver’s post) does not reflect the values of the leadership in the House, and for that reason he will no longer be part of the leadership,” Gunn said. “I’ve done what I believe is appropriate and immediate and I will continue to monitor that.” He also reiterated the statement he made earlier Monday morning, saying there is no stronger word to use than “condemn” for Oliver’s “unfortunate social media episode.” “I’ve done the best I can in the amount of time I’ve had to fool with it,” Gunn said. “I’ve called on the man to retract his statement, I’ve called on the man to apologize, and I disciplined him with the only thing I really have to discipline him with.”
“Incredibly disappointed in Karl Oliver’s remarks. Troubled that in 2017, these comments are still occurring,” the tweet said.
Sen. Sollie Norwood, D-Jackson, rejected Oliver’s apology and said the leadership should call for his resignation.
“I think Representative Karl Oliver meant it and I think it’s irresponsible for him to apologize for something that he meant. The term ‘lynching’ has long lasting, penetrating hurt. Having dealt with cross burnings and intimidation, we can’t just sit idly by and let this happen,” Norwood said in a statement. “I think if the leadership in Mississippi state government wants to be responsible they should join the call for Representative Oliver’s resignation. ”
(Mississippi Today reporter Ashley F.G. Norwood is the daughter of Sen. Norwood.)
Attorney Carlos Moore indicated on Facebook he would be filing a federal civil lawsuit against Oliver and the two lawmakers who liked the post. Moore also has a pending lawsuit against Gov. Phil Bryant to remove the state flag.
In an emailed statement, Attorney General Jim Hood’s spokesperson Margaret Ann Morgan said the law states it is illegal to threaten a person online, but Oliver did not threaten a specific individual.
“Section 97-29-45 (1)(b) of the Mississippi Code, makes it a crime to use electronic means to threaten a person or his/her property. Although this particular electronic communication did not arise to a crime by conveying a specific threat to a person, this is a good opportunity to remind people to think before posting comments on social media.”
Oliver, who was elected to office in 2016, also received a torrent of backlash last year when he told a Gulfport woman he ‘could care less’ about her concerns about tax breaks being considered by the Legislature. He also suggested she move out of the state.
“I see you are not a native to the Great State of Mississippi nor do you and I have similar political views,” he wrote to Becky Guidry. “I appreciate you going to the trouble to share yours with me, but quite frankly, and with all due respect, I could care less.” He then said he recommended Guidry return to Illinois, where “there are a rather large number of like minded citizens.”Winter Institute helped New Orleans address Confederate monuments
Contributing: Larrison Campbell and Adam Ganucheau
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
