Senate Finance chairman Joey Fillingane, R-Sumrall, left, and Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves tell reporters the House internet sales tax bill will not be accpeted by the Senate.

Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves said Monday that the House bill that would have created an internet sales tax will die in committee on Tuesday’s deadline for action.

The bill, which passed in the House by a 76-41 margin on Feb. 1, would require out-of-state businesses with more than $250,000 in sales but no physical presence in Mississippi to collect state sales tax from Mississippi customers.

“Frankly, we believe the bill is unconstitutional,” Reeves said in a meeting with reporters Monday. “I have yet to hear from one lawyer who thinks otherwise, including many of the House members who voted for this bill. They would tell you the most likely scenario is that if this were to pass, it simply put Mississippi in litigation along with Alabama and other states.”

In 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states did not have the right to tax inter-state sales, including internet sales. Reeves cited the case Monday, calling any revenue from the House bill “fake money” and “cannot be spent until the U.S. Supreme Court says it can be collected.”

Reeves also said the bill, if passed, would have transferred $40 million of revenue collected annually by an existing use tax on internet purchases from companies inside Mississippi.

“We don’t think this is a very good time to be transferring this $40 million out of the general fund,” Reeves said.

House Speaker Philip Gunn publicly supported the bill, citing the need for new revenue for roads and bridge repairs in the state.

House Speaker Philip Gunn, R-Clinton

“We don’t have anything to add at this point. Let’s see what happens once the deadline hits tomorrow,” said Meg Annison, spokeswoman for Gunn, after Reeves’ announcement. “We in the House are seeking a solution for our roads and bridges.”

Gunn, in a statement to Mississippi Today on Friday, urged the Senate to consider the bill, calling it “the last train out” for infrastructure repairs this session and was “the best long-term opportunity we have to do something for roads and bridges.”

Reeves, despite killing the House bill this week, said he does intend to focus on finding additional funding for roads and bridges.

“It is worthy of a discussion and talking about the need and desire (for infrastructure improvements),” Reeves said. “But should we transfer general fund dollars into another fund for roads and bridges, we ought to be above board.”

Proponents of the bill said the proposal would level the playing field for the state’s small business owners and brick-and-mortar stores and could provide new revenue for the state’s roads and bridges.

But opponents of the bill, including several Senate leaders, point to Washington, where Congress continues to consider whether states have the right to tax sales on the internet. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the authority to regulate interstate commerce.

Last week, Senate chairmen Sen. Terry Burton, R-Newton and Senate Pro Tempore, Sen. John Polk, R-Hattiesburg, and Fillingane all told Mississippi Today they doubted the bill would pass.

“Traditionally, I’d say the leadership here in the state Senate has focused on cutting taxes to make the business environment more friendly in Mississippi as opposed to raising taxes or creating new taxes that would create the opposite effect,” Fillingane told reporters on Monday.

Rep. Trey Lamar, R-Senatobia

Rep. Trey Lamar, R-Senatobia, author of the bill, estimated the new tax would generate between $50 million and $150 million per year. Gunn, in an interview with reporters in early February, said his office’s estimates were between $75 million and $125 million.

Provisions in the bill call for 70 percent of the funds to be used for roads and bridges; another 15 percent would go to counties for local roads and 15 percent would be distributed to municipalities to address their road needs.

Experts within the past several months directly cautioned Mississippi lawmakers against implementing the internet sales tax.

Last fall, Gunn and Reeves brought in an economist from Washington-based Tax Foundation, who answered multiple lawmakers’ questions over several different group sessions about the potential for a Mississippi internet sales tax.

Economist Nicole Kaeding said the Tax Foundation’s stance on the issue is that Congress should regulate sales on the internet because they are considered interstate sales, and she cited potential legal problems if the state were to introduce its own legislation on the issue.

“It doesn’t really matter what we pass until Congress does something on a national level,” Burton said last week. “I don’t think we can force anyone in the state to pay internet sales tax until we know what we can legally do on the state level.”


Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Adam Ganucheau, as Mississippi Today's editor-in-chief, oversees the newsroom and works with the editorial team to fulfill our mission of producing high-quality journalism in the public interest. Adam has covered politics and state government for Mississippi Today since February 2016. A native of Hazlehurst, Adam has worked as a staff reporter for, The Birmingham News and The Clarion-Ledger and his work has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post and Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Adam earned his bachelor’s in journalism from the University of Mississippi.

4 replies on “Reeves: Internet sales tax bill is dead”

  1. “Frankly, we believe the bill is unconstitutional,” Reeves said in a meeting with reporters Monday. “I have yet to hear from one lawyer who thinks otherwise. …They would tell you the most likely scenario is that if this were to pass, it simply put Mississippi in litigation along with Alabama and other states.”

    Reeves could just as easily be talking about 1523

  2. The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to rule on 1523 and related matters touching on religious liberty. There is a big difference between passing a law based on a policy that has already been ruled unconstitutional (i.e., out of state companies collecting sales tax, Quill v. North Dakota (1992)) and passing a law seeking to clarify a gray area in the law (i.e., 1523 and its balancing of the inherent right to religious liberty with the legal right to gay marriage). In answer to the other question: Yes, Amazon will collect sales tax owing to a non-transparent agreement between MS DOR and Amazon. The Miss. Justice Institute has filed an ethics complaint after its request to view the agreement was denied. Why the secrecy? What is Amazon getting for “voluntarily” collecting the tax? In other states, Amazon has been given economic incentives and tax breaks for making similar deals.

  3. Maybe if we had a plan to cut waste and corruption in entitlement programs . Quit trying to do things like the Capitol Complex bill . A redundant program that Downtown Partners and the Chamber of Commerce should be doing . These politicians have assumed power instead of serving the people . It has become insane . Education sucks cash like a vacuum cleaner but it goes to administration instead of the kids . Every time I see a call for supplies at my bank counter I want to scream . We need desperately to elect an entire new class of legislators , this bunch has failed miserably .

Comments are closed.