Mississippi voters approved Initiative 65, a citizen-sponsored proposal that legalizes medical marijuana.
Many state leaders argued the initiative was too broad and would approve marijuana with few restrictions. Voters rejected that argument on Tuesday, according to a declaration of victory by the initiative’s campaign. Unofficial vote counts tallied by the Associated Press show a wide margin of support from Mississippians.
While allowing medical use of marijuana has, according to polling, been popular with Mississippi voters, Tuesday’s vote was complicated and divisive.
A group of Mississippians, led in part by state Rep. Joel Bomgar, R-Madison, utilized the state’s ballot initiative process to put the question — Initiative 65 — on a statewide ballot. That process, completed in 2019, required about 100,000 petition signatures from Mississippians across the state.
But after years of balking at the issue at the Capitol, lawmakers opted earlier this year to place an alternative, Initiative 65-A, to the citizen-sponsored medical marijuana initiative, on the ballot.
This set up a ballot that required voters to first vote yes or no on whether they wanted either initiative to pass, then to pick one of the two. Another stipulation is that the winning proposal also must receive votes equaling 40% of the total votes cast in the election. Initiative 65 passed both those thresholds Tuesday.
One major debate was whether to put legalized medical marijuana into the state Constitution, as opposed to setting up a program in state law with legislative oversight. Both Initiative 65 and the alternative would amend the Constitution. Opponents of Initiative 65 argued that adopting it would prohibit elected leaders from regulating or improving the program.
Opponents also said Initiative 65 would leave Mississippi awash in pot and that it lacks thorough regulations or the ability to change or add them. Proponents said the legislative alternative Initiative 65A was so restrictive that it would effectively prevent sick Mississippians from being able to use a treatment helping millions of people in other states.
The city of Madison, led by Mayor Mary Hawkins, filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the state’s initiative process, and the lawsuit could place Tuesday’s election results in jeopardy. The lawsuit centers on the issue that the Constitution mandates that the signatures be gathered equally from the five congressional districts as they were drawn in 1990, In 2000, the state lost a congressional district, but the Legislature has not changed the language in the initiative law to require the signatures to be gathered from the four districts.
The Supreme Court opted not to rule on the case until after the election.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Look for the "Republish This Story" button underneath each story. To republish online, simply click the button, copy the html code and paste into your Content Management System (CMS).
- Editorial cartoons and photo essays are not included under the Creative Commons license and therefore do not have the "Republish This Story" button option. To learn more about our cartoon syndication services, click here.
- You can’t edit our stories, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style.
- You can’t sell or syndicate our stories.
- Any web site our stories appear on must include a contact for your organization.
- If you share our stories on social media, please tag us in your posts using @MSTODAYnews on Facebook and @MSTODAYnews on Twitter.
- You have to credit Mississippi Today. We prefer “Author Name, Mississippi Today” in the byline. If you’re not able to add the byline, please include a line at the top of the story that reads: “This story was originally published by Mississippi Today” and include our website, mississippitoday.org.
- You can’t edit our stories, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style.
- You cannot republish our editorial cartoons, photographs, illustrations or graphics without specific permission (contact our managing editor Kayleigh Skinner for more information). To learn more about our cartoon syndication services, click here.
- Our stories may appear on pages with ads, but not ads specifically sold against our stories.
- You can’t sell or syndicate our stories.
- You can only publish select stories individually — not as a collection.
- Any web site our stories appear on must include a contact for your organization.
- If you share our stories on social media, please tag us in your posts using @MSTODAYnews on Facebook and @MSTODAYnews on Twitter.